Product Description
High comparative measure wizz lens housed in a compress building a whole as well as incorporating Sigma’s weird OS (Optical Stabilizer) function. This telephoto wizz lens incorporates Sigma’s weird OS (Optical Stabilizer) duty as well as is housed in a compress construction. TheOS duty offers a operate of shiver speeds we estimate 4 stops slower than would differently be possible. The SLD (Special Low Dispersion) potion component provides glorious improvement for all sorts of abe… More >>
I own a more aged non-OS chronicle of this lens, though suspicion I’d “upgrade” to a OS version. It was a rubbish of money, as well as we finished up returning it.
First, a visual stabilization is no softened than a in-body stabilization upon my K10D – as well as we assimilate a newer bodies have softened a IS. After dozens of more aged shots in between in-lens stabilization as well as in-body stabilization – exam patterns, margin shots, assorted lighting conditions – we was forced to interpretation a lens had positively no value over a physique during all. Worse, it’s a bother when swapping lenses, given we need to recollect to switch off a in-body stabilization when we insert a lens, afterwards switch it behind upon when we barter an additional lens on. Forget, as well as we get a collection of becloud shots.
Given which Sigma charges twice as most for their stabilized lenses as for their non-stabilized ones, carrying which stabilization be invalid is kinda a large deal.
The engine – yes, a lens is motorized, though it’s zero fancy. The lens engine is conjunction quicker nor quieter than a in-body motor.
Image peculiarity wasn’t noticeably opposite from a non-OS version.
Also, a non-OS chronicle of this lens has macro focusing, up to 1:2 magnification. Sigma assumingly had to scapegoat which to fit a stabilization.
If you’re deliberation this lens (at slightest for a Pentax body) do yourself a preference – buy a non-OS chronicle during half a price: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG APO Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for Pentax as well as Samsung SLR Cameras
Rating: 1 / 5
Im pleased with this lens a crook afterwards my ef-s criterion during 200mm. we similar to the
fact it it is f5.6 during 300mm value a additional income as excellent as a visual stabilizing
works really well. Quick concentration with my 50d as excellent as vital in doorway 70mm photo’s
a contingency have!
Rating: 5 / 5
In operation of 70-250 Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG OS SLD Super MLC is really nice.
The most appropriate formula starts from F5.6 upon 70mm as well as during F10 stops upon 300mm range.
Also fantastic upon full support Canon 5D Mark II upto 250mm. Best formula from F6.3 stop.
Recomended if you’re in $300-400 cost tag.
Rating: 5 / 5
First a integrate of disproportion of counsel about this review: Newb to dSLR’s here!
I not long ago done a preference to get a dSLR due to my latest disappointment with a point-and-shoot during a Cherry Blossom Festival in D.C. we usually couldn’t get a design of what we was seeing. No fiddling with a point-and-shoot would constraint it.
I bought a Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Black) from Amazon. WOW! What a disproportion this smart as well as means square of art can make. we review reviews that pronounced fire with it for a bit until we confirm what we similar to to fire prior to removing an a single some-more lens. we took that recommendation as well as after a integrate of weeks, motionless we longed for a wizz with a bit of reach. After many terror due to a expense, we motionless upon a 70-300mm. In researching, we found a Sigma 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG OS SLD Super Multi-Layer Coated Telephoto Lens for Canon AF Mount Digital SLR Cameras. we usually couldn’t clear a a single some-more responsibility of a Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens for Canon EOS SLR Cameras. Both seemed to have a same simple facilities with a Canon carrying USM as well as improved repute as well as slighty improved reviews. The Sigma, but, seemed to reason a own in reviews generally for this amateur.
After carrying a Sigma for improved than a week as well as being utterly tender (again an amateur’s indicate of view), we started wondering usually how many improved a Canon could be. we started an online poke for pricing as well as was surprisingly means to run opposite a latest Canon upon eBay for a same price. New for a same price!! we pulled a trigger now reckoning if we similar to a Canon better, we could lapse a Sigma. If we favourite a Sigma better, we could many expected sell a Canon during a profit.
I perceived a Canon dual days after a squeeze as well as here have been my assessments.
-My out-the-box sense was wow, this thing is built many some-more completely than a Sigma. Where a Sigma is plastic, a criterion is metal. The Canon has some-more heft as well as girth as well as it looks as well as feels some-more veteran to this amateur. The Sigma has a fluffy cloaking as well as a Canon is easily accomplished metal. But that’s usually a look.
-I shot a integrate of shots regulating module during assorted focal lengths as well as did a corresponding comparison. The clarity, to my aged eyes, of a Canon was improved in all cases.
-Performance wise, we could not discuss it many disproportion in concentration speed of either. The Canon’s USM during concentration is unequivocally still where a Sigma could roughly arise a dead.
-The feel of a wizz ring operation upon both is equivalent, with a fibre of a Canon somewhat circumference out a Sigma. we wouldn’t import that heavily in a preference though.
-The OS in a Sigma is fantastic, though it has a bent to kind of boyant around in a viewfinder ever so solemnly that influenced me when sharpened during full wizz with core usually concentration comparison upon a tiny object. It seemed we had to keep relocating a camera to keep a concentration dot during a indicate we longed for to concentration upon or time a shiver to snap when a concentration indicate was lined up. we felt similar to this could minister to some-more fuzz caused by me we do so. The Canon’s IS is stone plain in this respect, ideally still in a viewfinder. The Sigma’s OS receptive to advice sounds similar to a unequivocally utterly whirring receptive to advice roughly spooky. The Canon’s is noisier with some-more of a rigging sound. Although we haven’t had a possibility to try it yet, a Canon has dual modes of IS: mode a single for plane AND straight as well as mode dual for plane OR straight only. The Sigma, to my knowledge, does not do a single citation only.
-The Canon additionally has a wizz close to keep a lens from fluctuating when upon foot around. The Sigma does not. The Canon seems parsimonious enough, though it is new. I’m not certain if this is necessary, though if it is, I’m blissful to see it. we do not know if a Sigma would ever get lax sufficient to magnify during walking. If it does, afterwards there is no lock.
-The smallest orifice of a Sigma is f/22 where a Canon goes all a approach to F/32. My pledge believe doesn’t know if this will be a factor, though usually a indicate of disproportion in in between a dual lenses.
-The Sigma comes with a lens metal cover as well as a Canon does not. The Canon branded metal cover cost some-more than $40!!! if we can find it. There seems to be confident people with non-Canon hoods during many some-more in accord with prices.
Conclusion: Would we suggest a Sigma to someone who had to widen a bill to get it? Yes. From what we experienced, it is a unequivocally excellent lens. If, similar to me, we agonized in in between a dual since of fact as well as afterwards got a event to fire with a Canon (not to discuss removing it latest for a same price), afterwards go for a Canon that is somewhat over a $100 some-more upon Amazon. I’m celebration of a mass Canon EOS Digital Photography Photo Workshop that is a excellent book as well as a man ceaselessly stresses a supremacy of Canon lenses. But, he usually shoots L-series glass, though says a non-L array have been still improved than most. we theory in a box of a Sigma contra a Canon, we would contend a Canon is a winner.
Rating: 4 / 5
Camera:
I’m a unapproachable owners of a Pentax K20D, which is additionally my initial DSLR (and SLR in general).
Experience:
Took up photography this past summer (summer 2009), yet I’ve place a lot of time as fantastic as investigate in to it so far. But I’m distant from a professional, of course.
Previous Lens(es):
Pentax 16-45mm f/4.0 SMC PDA ED AL Zoom Lens for Pentax as fantastic as Samsung Digital SLR Cameras which, by a way, we have been agreeably pleased with so distant as my customary lens. It’s additionally fantastic for me personally, since of my landscape/panorama interest.
Ownership Time:
~A week
Review:
This lens performs a avocation well. I’ll mangle a examination down in to serve sections:
Auto Focus Feature: It focuses sincerely quickly, smoothly, as fantastic as sincerely in decent light, as fantastic as hunts around for a small bit in low light settings (took it in to my windowless lavatory as fantastic as left a moment in a door), yet not as many as alternative consumer (price-wise) telephoto lenses.
Auto Focus Sound: To me it’s a flattering soothing sound/not as fantastic loud, yet we will notice it.
Optical Stabilization (OS): Works amazingly as fantastic as wonderfully, as fantastic as it can smoke-stack with a anti-shake underline built-in to a Pentax body. Slight premonition though– it makes this tall pitched humming receptive to advice when it’s working, competence be not heard to comparison ears (no offense here), as fantastic as really not heard in louder areas such as sports events, yet when you’re regulating it sensitively indoors– we competence have a slight complaint with those sitting subsequent to you. You do get used to it after a bit though, as fantastic as it stops as shortly as we stop regulating a OS underline (end a shot/stop dire a shiver half-way).
Weight as fantastic as Dimensions: It’s sincerely large (I hold a measure of 3 x 5 x 5 in a outline is exceedingly understated), yet not as large than alternative telephoto lenses from what we know. It’s got a bit of heft to it too, yet not back-breaking or anything; it IS poignant though, so keep which in thoughts if we devise upon bringing it upon a prolonged travel or something (maybe travel around with it + your camera rigging in your camera bag for an hour or so customarily around a residence to see if it’s manageable).
Functionality as fantastic as Performance: It does what it’s ostensible to, as fantastic as utterly fantastic during it too. As usual, with full telephoto operation (300mm), jolt as fantastic as stabilization spin a large cause as fantastic as issue; a visual stabilization helps a lot, as does a built-in Pentax anti-shake, yet you’re still really starting to wish to go a tripod if we have unsure hands, or wish really purify pictures. This is an emanate with many if not all telephoto lenses though. The wizz upon it is nice, as fantastic as have certain we do compensate courtesy to a actuality which it has a smallest focusing range. The actuality which it’s f/4.0-5.6 instead of f/4.5-5.6 equates to a small quicker shots, which is really a as fantastic as over a competitors. Update: So, low lighting/indoor situations, as predicted, have been not as fantastic fantastic with telephoto lenses; a low shiver speed we have to scapegoat for, if you’re starting in to telephoto ranges, makes it unfit to get a purify shot (without blur) sometimes; have something to prop against, or as we pronounced before, a tripod. I’ll be updating after upon inlet + outside shots.
Quality of Shots: The peculiarity of shots is intensely nice; we haven’t beheld any vignetting or misconception in a photos, yet so distant they’re been indoor + medium-lighting shots. Blur is an emanate with telephoto ranges, as referred to before, since picture stabilization can be customarily so excellent. More updates to come.
Ease of Use as fantastic as Installation: It’s really simple to install, customarily line up a concentration line with a arrow as fantastic as afterwards spin it until a click– it’s really cosy as fantastic as fits well. To operate a automobile concentration mode, switch a add-on from (M) to (AF), as fantastic as do a same upon your camera (from (MF) to (AF.C) [confirmed to work] or (AF.S)). Optical Stabilization (OS) is additionally a tab, as fantastic as we can switch it in between On as fantastic as Off; if it is On, it uses a camera’s battery as fantastic as will empty battery quicker than normal– so spin it off if we do not need it. Focusing ring as fantastic as wizz ring have been customary fare; although, if we have a lens metal cover upon (or filters), beware– if we indicate a camera/lens right down, a concentration ring competence change as fantastic as a front of a lens “pulled” out by gravity. So far, it seems to customarily be function sometimes, so we cruise it’s a usual occurrence; we could be incorrect as fantastic as customarily have gotten a poor a single (kind of a large house pet peeve for me, so it loses a star in “Quality of product” for that).
Overall Verdict:
If we have been seeking for a sincerely excellent, well-priced, third celebration telephoto lens (for your Pentax, or they have them for alternative brands as well), afterwards we competence really fantastic wish to cruise this. With reward visual stabilization capabilities, a peculiarity of which is customarily usually found in higher-end models, as fantastic as auto-focus which functions with a body, this is really a telephoto lens we should not skip out on. If we have been a veteran or have been aiming to implement close-up shots/telephoto lenses a lot some-more mostly as your default lens, afterwards we competence wish to wait for to customarily get a prosumer/pro one, yet for me as customarily a delegate lens, as fantastic as additionally upon a tighter bill of a consumer, this was an glorious understanding for me.
Rating: 5 / 5