<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 DG Macro Telephoto Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/</link>
	<description>Give idea for the best design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 01:25:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: M. Naser Jahan</title>
		<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1830</link>
		<dc:creator>M. Naser Jahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>I think it is better if you can save your money and buy a better lens. This lens is OK, but it&#039;s takes a long time to focus. If you want to take a picture of an animal, by the time that this lens focuses the animal is already gone. The macro is not what I had expected!! You can do a better macro photography by buying a +10 magnifying filter which costs $30 and use it on an 18-55 lens that comes with Nikon D40x and D40.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I consider &#105;&#116; &#105;&#115; improved &#105;&#102; &#119;&#101; &#99;&#97;&#110; save &#121;&#111;&#117;&#114; income &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; &#98;&#117;&#121; a improved lens. &#84;&#104;&#105;&#115; lens &#105;&#115; OK, though &#105;&#116;&#8217;s takes a prolonged time &#116;&#111; focus. &#73;&#102; &#119;&#101; wish &#116;&#111; take a design &#111;&#102; &#97;&#110; animal, &#98;&#121; a time &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; lens focuses a animal &#105;&#115; already gone. &#84;&#104;&#101; macro &#105;&#115; &#110;&#111;&#116; &#119;&#104;&#97;&#116; &#119;&#101; &#104;&#97;&#100; expected!! &#89;&#111;&#117; &#99;&#97;&#110; &#100;&#111; a improved macro photography &#98;&#121; shopping a +10 magnifying filter &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; costs $30 &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; operate &#105;&#116; upon &#97;&#110; 18-55 lens &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; comes &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; Nikon D40x &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; D40.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R. Velick</title>
		<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link>
		<dc:creator>R. Velick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>For all you consumers out there, I bought a Pentax FAJ 70-300, to see if it was as good as some of the reviews.  This lens got a sort of mixed rap, but, it takes much better pictures with my k10d than the Sigma.  The Sigma manual focus was tight in spots as it articulated, but it seemed to function properly.
&lt;br /&gt;I set up my tripod, mounted the camera and took pictures with just changing lenses, than going to my computer to &#039;see&#039; if the Pentax was indeed just a cheap film lens, not digital dedicated, with no redeeming money advantage.  Wrong.  Although, the Sigma lens arrived in a box that was big enough to let the lens box bounce around with absolutely nothing for packing, it may have been damaged in shipment.  So maybe the lens is OK, and it was damaged in shipment or????  The FA turned out much clearer and sharper than the Sigma in a fair test, but maybe the Sigma was damaged.  If it was not damaged, it sure was not worth the money.  I did not want to spend the money to check this inexpensive lens for optics and the electrics of the motor.  I took manually focused, and automatic.  I found the Sigma wanting. I try to spend my money where it goes the furthest.
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#70;&#111;&#114; &#97;&#108;&#108; &#119;&#101; consumers out &#116;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101;, &#119;&#101; paid &#102;&#111;&#114; a Pentax FAJ 70-300, &#116;&#111; see &#105;&#102; &#105;&#116; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#97;&#115; &#102;&#97;&#110;&#116;&#97;&#115;&#116;&#105;&#99; &#97;&#115; a small &#111;&#102; a reviews.  &#84;&#104;&#105;&#115; lens &#103;&#111;&#116; a arrange &#111;&#102; churned rap, &#98;&#117;&#116;, &#105;&#116; takes &#109;&#111;&#115;&#116; improved cinema &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#109;&#121; k10d &#116;&#104;&#97;&#110; a Sigma.  &#84;&#104;&#101; Sigma primer concentration &#119;&#97;&#115; parsimonious &#105;&#110; spots &#97;&#115; &#105;&#116; articulated, though &#105;&#116; seemed &#116;&#111; duty properly.<br />
<br />I set up &#109;&#121; tripod, mounted a camera &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; took cinema &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#111;&#110;&#108;&#121; becoming different lenses, &#116;&#104;&#97;&#110; starting &#116;&#111; &#109;&#121; mechanism &#116;&#111; &#8216;see&#8217; &#105;&#102; a Pentax &#119;&#97;&#115; &#105;&#110; truth &#111;&#110;&#108;&#121; a cheap movie lens, &#110;&#111;&#116; digital dedicated, &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; &#110;&#111; saving income advantage.  Incorrect.  Although, a Sigma lens arrived &#105;&#110; a box &#119;&#104;&#105;&#99;&#104; &#119;&#97;&#115; large sufficient &#116;&#111; &#108;&#101;&#116; a lens box rebound around &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; positively zero &#102;&#111;&#114; packing, &#105;&#116; &#109;&#105;&#103;&#104;&#116; &#104;&#97;&#118;&#101; &#98;&#101;&#101;&#110; shop-worn &#105;&#110; shipment.  &#83;&#111; &#109;&#97;&#121; &#98;&#101; a lens &#105;&#115; OK, &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; &#105;&#116; &#119;&#97;&#115; shop-worn &#105;&#110; conveyance &#111;&#114;????  &#84;&#104;&#101; FA incited out &#109;&#111;&#115;&#116; clearer &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; crook &#116;&#104;&#97;&#110; a Sigma &#105;&#110; a satisfactory test, though &#109;&#97;&#121; &#98;&#101; a Sigma &#119;&#97;&#115; &#104;&#117;&#114;&#116;.  &#73;&#102; &#105;&#116; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#110;&#111;&#116; &#104;&#117;&#114;&#116;, &#105;&#116; &#99;&#101;&#114;&#116;&#97;&#105;&#110; &#119;&#97;&#115; &#110;&#111;&#116; value a money.  &#119;&#101; &#100;&#105;&#100; &#110;&#111;&#116; wish &#116;&#111; outlay a income &#116;&#111; check &#116;&#104;&#105;&#115; cheap lens &#102;&#111;&#114; optics &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; a electrics &#111;&#102; a motor.  &#119;&#101; took manually focused, &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; automatic.  &#119;&#101; found a Sigma wanting. &#119;&#101; try &#116;&#111; outlay &#109;&#121; income &#119;&#104;&#101;&#114;&#101; &#105;&#116; goes a furthest.<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Rogers</title>
		<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1828</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>received lense with lens cover pushed into lens leaving a scratch, so I returned it.  
&lt;br /&gt;Return was easy, no hassle.  Went for the 28-300 Tamron lense instead.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>received lense &#119;&#105;&#116;&#104; lens cover pushed &#105;&#110; &#116;&#111; lens withdrawal a scratch, &#115;&#111; &#119;&#101; returned &#105;&#116;.<br />
<br />Return &#119;&#97;&#115; simple, &#110;&#111; hassle.  &#87;&#101;&#110;&#116; &#102;&#111;&#114; a 28-300 Tamron lense instead.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romulo Caballero</title>
		<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1827</link>
		<dc:creator>Romulo Caballero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras#comment-1827</guid>
		<description>need more info on types of camera bodies these lenses will go such as digital cameras or not ie all minolta cameras or only digitals etc.had to call service rep. for help
Rating: 4 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>need &#115;&#111;&#109;&#101;-more info upon sorts &#111;&#102; camera bodies &#116;&#104;&#101;&#115;&#101; lenses &#119;&#105;&#108;&#108; &#103;&#111; such &#97;&#115; digital cameras &#111;&#114; &#110;&#111;&#116; ie &#97;&#108;&#108; minolta cameras &#111;&#114; usually digitals etc.&#104;&#97;&#100; &#116;&#111; call &#117;&#115;&#101; rep. &#102;&#111;&#114; &#104;&#101;&#108;&#112;<br />
Rating: 4 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark A. Young</title>
		<link>http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras/comment-page-1/#comment-1826</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 04:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tophotdesign.com/sigma-70-300mm-f4-5-6-dg-macro-telephoto-zoom-lens-for-canon-slr-cameras#comment-1826</guid>
		<description>You can see out of it and press a button and make a picture of a happy time.
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#89;&#111;&#117; &#99;&#97;&#110; see out &#111;&#102; &#105;&#116; &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; press a symbol &#97;&#115; well &#97;&#115; &#104;&#97;&#118;&#101; a design &#111;&#102; a &#112;&#108;&#101;&#97;&#115;&#101;&#100; time.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

