Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Aspherical Large Aperture Standard Zoom Lens for Sigma SLR Cameras
Posted by Hotdesign
on November 7, 2010
Product Description
Large orifice wizz starting from 24mm as well as realizing a limit orifice F-value of 2.8 As for a front component does not stagger during a time of focusing…. More >>
Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro Aspherical Large Aperture Standard Zoom Lens for Sigma SLR Cameras
Blog, Electronics2470mm, Aperture, Aspherical, Cameras, f/2.8, Large, Lens, Macro, Sigma, Standard, Zoom
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I was unequivocally vehement to get this lens as well as mayyybe didn’t give it a prolonged sufficient possibility though we found it was complicated as well as approach tooooo huge. The couple of pics we did take with it came out ok though it wasn’t value it to me to not wish to lift it out as well as operate it so behind it went
Rating: 3 / 5
This is not a fantastic lens to use. Aperture F2.8, 16-32 have been invalid since it is as well soft. It is really heavy. A fantastic filter of 82mm is really expensive. If we have a money, we should buy a canon’s 24-70 L lens.
Rating: 3 / 5
I did usually about thirty exam shots with this prior to determining to lapse it. Not a single design was in focus. we do know sufficient about depth-of-field to order which out as a problem. Even during f/2.8, there should be a small pointy underline somewhere inside of a concentration rectangle in a viewfinder. There wasn’t. Not even once. I’ve never had this complaint with any alternative lens, trimming from costly Nikkor primes as well as zooms to cheap Tamron ultrazooms. Lenses have to work, right out of a box. This a single didn’t.
Rating: 1 / 5
I have been an “amateur” Nikon shooter for over 10 years. we now am sharpened a Nikon D200 as well as have had a Nikkor pack lens (35-105 3.5-4.5) for a really prolonged time. Although this lens is really pointy we longed for to ascent in this focal length.
I motionless to go with Sigma over a Nikon in this operation especially due to price, (about 150 dollars or so less)…
My initial duplicate of a Sigma had froth in a potion that was quick as well as simply replaced. Second duplicate is pristine.
Findings:
Very sharp. we cannot discuss it a disproportion in between this as well as my Nikon during any f-stop. Although people have complained that this lens is soothing during 2.8, we cannot see it.
Lens feels sturdy
AF is discerning sufficient for me, nonetheless USM would have been excellent. Come upon Sigma this is ostensible to be your pro line.
Although a small contend a lens is complicated we only do not consider so. Although we additionally regularly place straight grips / battery packs upon all my body’s.
Complaints:
Lens metal cover is silly. They could have come up with a larger / deeper hood. we am still seeking for one.
Non continue hermetic that is a bit of regard for a small impassioned environments.
Bottom line:
Tack pointy excellent lens for a price. Have compared images side by side as well as cannot discuss it a difference. we have seen “scientific” comparisons with exam grids articulate about Chromatic Shifts as well as Aberrations, though privately we similar to seeking during a genuine picture as well as we can’t see a difference.
Just buy it!
Rating: 4 / 5
This is a excellent quick lens though in a end we opted for a Tamron 28-75/2.8 which, whilst not as wide, is only most simpler to manage.
My dual samples were additionally somewhat injured though maybe we only got detrimental since differently a lens is really excellent regarded.
Rating: 4 / 5