- 17-55mm wide-angle wizz lens with f/2.8 limit orifice for Canon DSLR cameras
- AD as well as aspherical elements broach considerable picture peculiarity by complete wizz range
- Image Stabilizer lens groups change to recompense for picture shake up even in low lighting
- Large round orifice produces shoal abyss of field; ring-type ultra-sonic guard (USM)
- Measures 3.3 inches in hole as well as 4.4 inches long; weighs 22.8 ounces; 1-year warranty
Product Description
To encounter user final for a quick EF-S wizz lens, Canon has specifically written a latest lens with a vast orifice of f/2.8 for name Canon Digital SLR cameras.* The vast round orifice produces a shoal depth-of-field, formulating credentials fuzz that draws courtesy to a detailed subject. The lens building a whole includes UD as well as aspherical elements, that broach considerable picture peculiarity via a complete wizz range. Image Stabilizer lens groups change to comp… More >>
OK. Last week we paid for “kit” – Canon 40D with 17-55 2.8 IS
This tandem is superb, excellent built, looks fantastic…but
My lens had front focus. Very weird, since we paid for physique with lens together in a singular box. When we was sharpened mural print as well as set concentration upon model’s eye, a concentration was set upon nose or blouse that was placed nearer.
Last friday we went to emporium in that we paid for this “kit” to shift body/lens to get undiluted photos. Unfortunately not a singular a singular multiple confident me. I’ve attempted 3 17-55, a singular Tamron 17-50 2.8, a singular Canon 100 2.0 as well as 5 Canon 40D bodies. Every multiple had front focus.
I returned “kit” as well as suspicion about shopping Canon 5D with 24-70 2.8, but… we do not wish any problems with focusing any more (especially that this bodies/lenses aren’t cheap)
Now we cruise (and I’m sure) to buy Nikon D300, that has concentration composition in body.
I do not contend Canon is a “piece of s*” Perhaps we didn’t had a luck, though it’s unequivocally irritating go to emporium as well as spending 6 hours there, perplexing opposite combinations as well as not a a singular is OK. Thank we really most CANON for such surprise.
Rating: 3 / 5
This is a fantastic lens. But a EF-S array usually work upon a 1.6x stand cameras, similar to a 20D, Rebel XTI, XT, 30D, 40D, etc.. Not upon a 5D, a movie bodies similar to a eos 3 as well as eos 1, nor upon a Mark bodies. Thus we wouldnt buy a single as we still fire film, as well as we additionally have a 1D Mark 3 we fire with all a time as well as my 40D is my backup, as well as my 10D is converted for usually IR usage, as well as a awesome.
If we demeanour during a optics, this lens is flattering excellent, though a 17-40 is fantastic as well as it blows a picture peculiarity away. Granted a 17-40 is F4, not 2.8, though many people dont need 2.8 unless we have been we do a lot of low light indoor sharpened or a wedding, as well as if we have been we do a wedding, we should get L potion for a improved peculiarity anyways! we can fire my 17-40 upon my 40D or Mark 3 during 1600 ISO with out any issues as well as still blow them up, a lot improved than my buddies Nikon D80 or D200 during even 800 ISO!!! He needs to be during about 400 to try to contest with a noise/pixelation of a 40D @ 1600 ISO!!!
If we never devise to get a improved camera than a 40D series, as well as postulated those have been unequivocally fantastic cameras, though if we wish to go to pro class or nearly pro grade, similar to a 5D this lens will not work for you. Also we dont unequivocally need IS upon a far-reaching point of view lens! Just demeanour during a New pro model, a 16-35II as well as it dont got IS upon it… we figure if your not over 70-100mm we dont unequivocally need IS. Shoot we have a 500MM F4.5 indication w/o IS as well as a awesome, even handheld. BUT IS does not help we if we have been upon a tripod, regularly recollect that!
Hope this helps!
Rating: 4 / 5
I systematic a $1000 lens from Amazon as well as they shipped it similar to it was an Instamatic. The Canon box was inside a shipping box with a small lax burble wrap, not trustworthy to a Canon box. The lens arrived undamaged, though it wasn’t Amazon’s error it wasn’t hurt. we wrote them about it as well as they sent a answer which they would speak to their shipping dept. About a week later, we went to a forum during DPReview.com as well as saw alternative people mad about a same thing. we wrote Amazon again revelation them which their repute was being shop-worn as well as they sent a generic, mechanism generated answer which didn’t convice me they were removing a message.
I will not sequence an additional lens from Amazon…it’s not value a risk when alternative Internet camera stores take a caring to have certain these costly lenses arrive undamaged. You can’t operate a same wrapping truth as we would for shipping a book.
WR
Rating: 1 / 5
Okay. Everything we have listened about this lens says which it is a FANTASTIC lens. Resolution total have been between a most appropriate totalled upon photozone.de. Chromatic aberations have been low. The wizz operation is FANTASTIC for a travel around lens. And distortions have been not as well terrible. Vignetting is rather of a complaint during 17mm as well as f/2.8, though not unequivocally a understanding killer. So what is there not to like? Two things: a price as well as a actuality which it is an EF-S lens. Now as a small people have said, this lens should be done improved for a cost. But this is not a REAL issue. The REAL emanate is which we have been profitable over $1000 for a lens which could a single day turn zero some-more than an costly paperweight. Now we all know which a REAL reason since Canon done cropped sensor cameras is a initial place is cost. And we all know which as a price of full-frame sensors comes down, Canon will expected stop creation cropped sensor cameras (because it will be purposeless to have them). When/if which happens, theory what? You can’t operate this costly lens. But, even if they keep creation cropped sensor cameras, there is during slightest a rather decent possibility we will a single day step up to a full support camera. And this lens WON’T be means to have a pierce to a full support camera. You will, as a most appropriate box scenario, have to sell a lens during a detriment in sequence to buy something which will work for you. My advice? Stick with full-frame EF lenses. They work FANTASTIC (although they do not have this wizz range). But some-more importantly, as prolonged as we hang with Canon, they will not turn obsolete.
Rating: 3 / 5
This lens was a fantastic lens upon a stand physique (like a 30D) for a money. Even yet it’s not an “L” lens, it’s still really sharp, as well as a 2.8 as well as IS have been fantastic for low light photography. The usually downside was a set up of a lens. It tends to mangle easily, as well as for no reason, yet Canon is really fantastic during regulating it quickly. Now, though, a cost of a lens has only about doubled for a small reason, as well as we really wouldn’t suggest shopping it whilst Amazon is offered it for $1700. Wait until it’s reduction than $1000 again, since it’s not value it until then.
Rating: 4 / 5