Comments on: Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM Standard Zoom Lens for Canon SLR Cameras

By: T. Swanson

T. Swanson — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 10:33:47 +0000

First, we am an amateur. we bought this lens given we am starting to start receiving my photography most some-more severely as well as motionless to get a fantastic lens right divided given we had a funds.

I find which my lens doesn’t appear to be as pointy as well as frail as I’d like. My aged G5 shot crook photos. I’m regulating an EOS 30D body. I’ve take about 2,000 photos with each possible multiple – automobile focus, primer focus, zoomed in, zoomed out, inside outside, built in flash, EX-580, diffuser as well as so on. The photos demeanour nice, though not sharp. Edges have been regularly appear soothing to me.

Is there a well known forsake in this array with sure makes? we assimilate which this lens has a reduced abyss of view, as well as have accounted for that. we am severely deliberation returning this lens for a f/4 is 24-105L. Being an amateur, we do instruct larger depth, generally during tighten operation as well as we wouldn’t thoughts something a small lighter.

Is it simply a have a difference of me wanting to sense some-more as well as which this lens will in a future live up to it’s reputation? we am a picky person, though we do not consider we am being overly picky in this case. Like we said, my G5 takes crook pictures. Thanks for any advice.

*EDIT*

I might have found a resolution as well as will exam it serve later. we paid for my 30D with a lens as well as this is my initial turn with DSLRs. we changed a dial to a user selectable dials as well as a menu options have been opposite than in a automobile environment dials. The last red menu object (can’t recollect what it’s called) is a portal to some-more primer user settings after dire a “Jump” button. From there, we was means to regulate a ill temper from a default to a max. It softened a ill temper of a photos a lot. There have been additionally settings for saturation, contrariety as well as a integrate others. I’d similar to to exam it out upon people prior to creation last judgement.

I still instruct we could have a automobile settings sharper, though being how this is DSLR, a automobile functions unequivocally aren’t what we paid for this for. I’d still conclude any input/advice from a pros.
Rating: 4 / 5

By: W. Fish

W. Fish — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:16:51 +0000

It’s a excellent lens with a superb design though when it is lengthened for a widest point of view shots a lengthened partial of a lens blocks partial of a built in peep from a Canon EOS cameras. It won’t be a complaint if we operate an appendage peep similar to a speedlite though it will be a genuine complaint with a built in flash. Most of my peep photographs have a excellent dim arc but light since a lens blocks a flash. If we have been starting to outlay which most for a lens we should know it will be a terrible buy for photos with your built in flash.
Rating: 3 / 5

By: Clifford Mcintosh

Clifford Mcintosh — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 07:40:31 +0000

I’m an pledge photographer with singular skills. we paid for this lens to operate to fire waterfalls as well as alternative landscapes. I’m really gratified with it.
Rating: 4 / 5

By: ED F

ED F — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:24:16 +0000

Extremely miserable with this lens. Poor concentration after 15′, Images never pointy underneath any condition. Not during all what we would design from an L series. Lots of $$$$ terrible performance. Working upon third copy. Unfortunately did not get possibility to weigh before to guaranty using out.

CAUTION!!!!

PS unsuccessful to investigate product reviews before to buy, My Terrible, Better fitness to all!
Rating: 1 / 5

By: C. V. Gasper

C. V. Gasper — Thu, 29 Jul 2010 04:44:20 +0000

I have a single of these lenses andf it’s possibly inadequate during indicate of squeeze or it’s protrusion not as pointy as it sould be, specifically for a price!
Rating: 1 / 5